Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in thy sight, oh Lord, my strength and my redeemer. Psalm 19:14.

Saturday, 26 April 2008

Wednesday, 02 April 2008

  • Jesus prayed for us.

    Jesus prayed for us.

    I've known about John 17 for quite a while now, and I've read it before.  But as I read Jesus' prayer again this morning, it seemed like some deeper realization was coming into me.  I don't have any real insight to offer.  I just feel something different in my mind and even in my body every time I think about it.

    Jesus prayed for me.

    What a message for a new day!  I do feel stronger, just thinking that my Lord offered a prayer for me, waaaaaay before I was even formed in my mother's womb.

    Jesus prayed for you.

    Be encouraged today.  Jesus had you in mind when he prayed for both those that would believe through His disciples, and for His disciples directly.  That's the way the Christian life progresses for a lot of us, no?  As the Holy Spirit works in us, we are often jolted or eased toward Jesus by someone's testimony, and then through direct communion with Christ and receiving instruction directly from Him through His Word.

    Jesus prayed for us,

    that we would be united in Him, as He is one with the Father.  He promised us and sent us the Holy Spirit to comfort and guide and teach and convict us.  He wants us to experience life with Him, and He wants us to share that life and light with others.

    Jesus prayed for those who would believe through us.

    Our words and our example should be a living testimony of the God that gave His Only and His all to save mankind.

    Jesus prayed for us.  Jesus prayed for usJesus prayed for us.  He prayed for us. 

    The Lord of the universe prayed for us.  The Creator of the heavens and the earth, and all that in them is, prayed for us.  The One who loves and values us so much that He was willing to suffer and die for us prayed for us, and continues to intercede on our behalf, presenting our prayers to His Father.

    Jesus prayed for us.



Tuesday, 25 March 2008

  • He will hear us

    “So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.” Romans 10:17

     “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” John 1:1

     “God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son, whom He hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also He made the worlds…” Hebrews 1:1-2

    Matthew 20:30-34
    And behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, “Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou son of David.  And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace: but they cried the more, saying, “Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou son of David.  And Jesus stood still, and called them, and said, “What will ye that I shall do unto you?  They say unto him, “Lord, that our eyes may be opened.”  So Jesus had compassion on them, and touched their eyes: and immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed Him.

     
    God has spoken to us many times and in many ways.  What’s left is to ask Him to open our eyes, that we may follow Him.  We need to cry out to Him.  Today’s world is constantly telling us that there is no god to hear us, and even if there were, he wouldn’t hear us, he wouldn’t get involved in our mess.  But that’s not the God I know.  The God I know, with all He has to do, will stand still and call out to us when we seek Him.  He will hear us.

Monday, 24 March 2008

  • Let him have thy cloke also

    Matthew 5:38-42    "Ye have heard that it hath been said, `An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.'  But I say unto you that ye resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.  And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him two.  Give to him that asketh thee; and from him that would borrow of thee, turn not thou away."

    Matthew 17:24-27  And when they had come to Capernaum, those who collected the tribute money came to Peter and said, "Doth not your master pay tribute?"  He said, "Yes." And when he had come into the house, Jesus preceded him, saying, "What thinkest thou, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? From their own children, or from strangers?" Peter said unto Him, "From strangers." Jesus said unto him, "Then are the children free.  Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea and cast a hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up. And when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money. That take, and give unto them for Me and thee."

    ~~~~~~~

    There was something wrong with this picture.  Someone was trying to collect temple taxes from Peter and Jesus, when they apparently shouldn't have been.  (I don't know what the temple tax was for, or what the deal was on on who was a stranger or a "son" of the area.  But I trust what Jesus said, and Jesus said something was fishy.)  Even still, Jesus has Peter pay him, in order to avoid offending him or making him angry.  Jesus did it to teach Peter, and us, a valuable lesson.  Peter, when faced with the problem, didn't have a way to pay the tax, so he went to Jesus.  Jesus didn't have money on Him.  So, as Lord of all, He had Peter get some money out of a fish's mouth.  Now they had both the tribute money (that didn't really have to be paid) and a meal.  Even if someone takes away your rights or abuses you in some way, go to Jesus: He'll give you both an answer for your oppressor and an extra blessing for yourself.


Tuesday, 18 March 2008

  • Apology, apologize, apologists, apologetics...

    There's going to be a talk tomorrow by Tim Keller, author of The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism.  The talk will be called, "The Trouble with Christianity: Why it's so hard to believe it."  I'm planning on going...

    This is what got me thinking about the word "apologetics".  My gut reaction to the word has always been to think, "Apologetics?  What do we have to apologize about?"  But then I think, Well, apologists don't ask forgiveness for believing in God.  Instead, they attempt to defend the faith.

    So I finally looked up apologetics to see the roots of the word.  It's from the Greek apologetikos, which means "suitable for defense"; and that comes from the Greek apologeisthai, which means "to defend oneself verbally"; and that comes from apologos, which means "story" or "apology".  Now I feel more enlightened, though I feel ending with apology almost leaves me where I started.  An apology can be (1) a written or spoken expression of one's regret, or (2) a defense, excuse, or justification in speech or writing, as for a cause or doctrine.  (Why does it say "story," though?  Applying that meaning to the idea of defense, would the Greeks use stories to present their defense?  Or just to illustrate?  I guess it doesn't matter...)

    The point: It seems to me that the way we use apology and apologize now has somehow come to hide two otherwise strong expressions under one ambiguous banner, and has made the meaning of apologists and apologetics require more effort to grasp.  To use the word apology in the sense of a defense of a doctrine or a cause evokes the idea of strength and commands attention (although the cause being defended may not be honorable at all).  To express regret more meaningfully, in a more heartfelt way, the words, "please forgive me" are so much stronger than "I apologize."  "I apologize," even if said with tears, can't have the same effect.  (I can picture myself laughing at a native English speaker trying to say "I apologize" to me with teary eyes.  Just the thought makes me chuckle, in a cynical way.  Cruel, perhaps?)

    Maybe it's because "I apologize" only requires me to give you something, while "please forgive me" is also asking you to give me something in return. "I apologize" almost lets you get away with whatever it was you did, because you're not waiting for your victim to say or feel anything in response, really. Now, I know people who say "I apologize" may be saying it because it's a cool word and they just want to get away from the monotony of "sorry," which in itself is used so often and mindlessly that it's losing its meaning.  (In case you're wondering, sorry is from the Middle English sori, from Old English sārig, which means "sad, distressed, full of sorrow"; that's from sār, which means "sore".)  (Pardon is like forgiveness in that it requires an exchange, but is it as strong as forgiveness?  Literally translating it from...whatever language(s)... "par" is a prefix for "for" (Spanish/Portuguese por, French par), and "don" comes from the English donate or the Spanish/Portuguese donar or the French donner or the Latin donare, "to give".  Forgive, pardon-- same word!  In this case, "forgive" is more watered down than "pardon".  I'll have to think about that some more.)

    [
    I'm wondering about how pardon relates to justice, and whether it has more significance as psychological or spiritual freedom for the victim.  Going from an idea that Pr. Conway said at GYC: If the idea of pardon is that the victim takes on, in a sense, the punishment for himself instead of letting the wrongdoer take the punishment, then it follows that no wrong act goes unpunished.  But if the wrongdoer is not repentant, he's almost disconnected from the experience.  It's almost as though the wrongdoer were "never there" to begin with, and the victim would be taking extra punishment onto himself.  Then, there's no substitution actually taking place, because the wrongdoer isn't handing over the guilt (arguably, he had no guilt to hand over, in this case).  If justice manifest requires that either (1) the wrongdoer is punished or (2) the victim "drops the charges," so to speak, not being sincere in saying "I apologize" doesn't fulfill the requirements of justice because (1) the wrongdoer isn't punished and (2) the victim can't drop what isn't in his hands.  Instead, a heartless expression of regret does violence to the victim.  I guess if the victim feels that he is granting forgiveness, whether the "apology" was sincere or not, he will be freed from that burden.  That's all God asks.  He knows each heart, and will deal with insincerity: "But let your communication be `yea, yea' or `nay, nay'; for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil" (Matt. 5:37).  That verse is in the context of making oaths, but isn't it just as good in compelling us to speak clearly and decidedly, not only not to actively deceive, but also to avoid opportunities for miscommunication?  "But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the Word of God deceitfully; but by manifesting the truth we commend ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God" (2 Cor. 4:2).  So if the idea of justice I expressed here isn't completely wrong (it very well may be), I guess, yes, the psychological and spiritual freedom is more important--to us, anyways--than the question of whether justice was served.  That question is up to God to decide.] 

    Social ties are important, no?  Forgiveness...it can only happen when the potential granter looks with compassion upon another's state of being and acts unselfishly to relieve him.  Powerful.

    I accept that words and their uses change over time, and also that letting words have ambiguous meanings can be useful in some cases, like in poetry; but wouldn't language be more powerful if a word conveyed the meaning it was really meant to convey?  Also, less confusing.  Imagine if apology were ever used with both its meanings at the same time.  Would my "expression of regret" about my actions really be, underneath, a "defense or justification" of my wrong actions, devoid of sincere repentance?  Or would my "defense or justification" of a cause be, underneath, an "expression of regret" about the cause I'm supposed to be defending?  That was what my gut was telling me way back at the beginning of this post, before I took the time to think about it.  I know what apologetics means, now; but it still bothers me that its structure is so... IDENTIFIABLE... with the popular use of apology.

    The ultimate point: We're the children of a God who said, "so shall My word be that goeth forth out of My mouth: It shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it" (Is. 55:11).  Having been made in His image, we should aspire to express words that accomplish the things we mean them to say, and to avoid words that would accomplish ungodly things.  Even more, while we don't have to obsess all the time about word origins to the extent I did here-- we'd go crazy, honestly-- it would be nice to know what the words we say really mean and how they can be understood before we use them.  Our words don't have the same power as God's, but they still are influential.  We know the power words have to build up and to break down, so we have to be careful not to abuse that power.

    And this was supposed to be a short post with some random, disconnected thoughts.  It's so hard to be concise!  Maybe I should have been a linguistics concentrator.  Sociolinguistics...  Hmmm.... Linguistic Sociology?

    Thanks to dictionary.com for help with the word origins.  :)

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

  • Noticing a pattern...

    I think God has been trying to get a particular message across to me during this past week...
    • Recognizing one's need for the Spirit, and repenting
    • Praying for the Holy Spirit
    • Asking to receive in order to give

    Monday- Sunday:

    ·        “Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Mat. 5:3).

    ·       "Whom Christ pardons, He first makes penitent, and it is the office of the Holy Spirit to convince of sin.  Those whose hearts have been moved by the convicting Spirit of God see that there is nothing good in themselves.  They see that all they have ever done is mingled with self and sin.  Like the poor publican, they stand afar off, not daring to lift up so much as their eyes to heaven, and cry, “God, be merciful to me the sinner.  Luke 18:13.  And they are blessed.  There is forgiveness for the penitent; for Christ is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” John 1:29.  God’s promise is: “Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” “A new heart also will I give you….And I will put My Spirit within you.” Isaiah 1:18; Ezekiel 36:26, 27. “ (MB 7-8)

    Sabbath:

    ·         “But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me…unto the uttermost part of the earth” (Acts. 1:8).

    ·         “These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication…And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place….And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance” (Acts 1:14; 2:1,4).

    Monday:

    ·         “...Friend, lend me three loaves; for a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him?...And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you….If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?” (Luke 11:5-6,9,13).


  • Glad to be veg...

    California packer makes largest U.S. beef recall

    Date updated: February 18, 2008
    Content provided by Reuters

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A California meatpacker accused of animal cruelty is making the largest U.S. meat recall on record -- 143 million pounds, the U.S. Agriculture Department said on Sunday.

    Most of the meat, raw and frozen beef products, probably has already been consumed, said USDA officials at a briefing. Some 37 million lbs were bought for school lunches and other federal nutrition programs. USDA said there was only a minor risk of illness from eating the beef.

    Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Co voluntarily recalled all of its beef produced since February 1, 2006. USDA said Hallmark violated rules against the slaughter of "downer cattle" -- that is, animals too ill to walk.

    "This is the largest beef recall in the history of the United States, unfortunately," said Agriculture Undersecretary Richard Raymond.

    Based in Chino, California, Hallmark/Westland has been closed since early February. Company officials were not immediately available for comment.

    The Humane Society of the United States showed videotapes on January 30 showing workers at the plant using several abusive techniques to make animals stand up and pass a pre-slaughter inspection. These included ramming cattle with forklift blades and using a hose to simulate the feeling of drowning.

    "A recall of this staggering scale proves that it's past time for Congress and the USDA to strengthen our laws for the sake of people and animals," said HSUS president Wayne Pacelle.

    Raymond said the recall stemmed from slaughter of cattle that could not stand at the time of slaughter, although they passed inspection earlier. Packers are required to alert USDA veterinarians in those cases so they can decide if the animal can be slaughtered for food.

    In most cases, beef from downer cattle is barred from the food supply. The rule was adopted as a safeguard against "mad cow" disease, a deadly, brain-wasting illness. People can contract a version of the disease by eating tainted products. USDA said there are many other safeguards against mad cow.

    'LITTLE HEALTH RISK'

    Until now, the largest U.S. meat recall was 35 million lbs in 1999.

    USDA said the Hallmark/Westland recall ranked as a minor health risk because it involved a violation of inspection rules rather than proof of contamination. Most of the meat products recalled were beef, but a small amount was ground pork, according to the department.

    Announcement of the recall will help the search for beef produced by Hallmark/Westland that may be held in freezer plants.

    Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Harkin said in a statement that USDA must toughen its inspection measures before animals are slaughtered to prevent future occurrences.

    "How much longer will we continue to test our luck with weak enforcement of federal food safety regulations?" said Harkin, an Iowa Democrat. "Federal regulations exist for a reason - to protect public health. For Hallmark/Westland to issue a recall that goes back two years indicates that violations may have been long-term."

    Four senior Democrats in Congress, including Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin, told the General Accounting Office on Thursday to investigate the safety of meat in the school lunch program in light of the Hallmark/Westland case.


    http://www.revolutionhealth.com/healthy-living/food-nutrition/kitchen/food-safety/beef-recall?s_kwcid=meat%20recall|961688034

Sunday, 17 February 2008

  • The Beatitudes

    I had a "wow" moment with this passage in the Bible and wanted to share.... sadly, though, the web/photo blogs aren't the best places to see something like this... but I'll put it on anyways, maybe it'll be bigger and somewhat legible when you click on it...




       

Saturday, 09 February 2008

  • Be

    Just looking through my blog, I've noticed I've had all different fonts in all different sizes... I guess I'm not used to this yet.  Haven't quite found a format I like yet.  Let's see how this turns out...

     

    It's been over a month since GYC.  I can hardly believe it! But some reflections from it are long overdue (right, Ellen?).  Here's a general, overall look... maybe other thoughts from seminars and such will pop up every once in a while afterwards.



    ~~~   ~~~   ~~~

     

    "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

    And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God."  ~Romans 12:1,2~

     

    Something that caught my attention throughout the weekend was how Jesus' identity was constantly being questioned.  From the very beginning of His ministry on Earth, right after His baptism, Jesus went out to the desert.  There, Satan met Him, ready with a weapon that he continues to use today: "If thou be the Son of God..."  Toward the end of His ministry on Earth, on the cross, onlookers mocked our Lord:

     

    "And they that passed by reviled him, wagging their heads, and saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.  Likewise also the chief priests mocking him, with the scribes and elders, said, He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.  He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God."  (Matthew 27:39-43)

     

    At least three times in this account alone, Jesus' true identity is rejected by men.  And wherever He went, someone was prepared to say, Who does this guy think he is?  Isn't this Joseph the carpenter's son?  Mary's son?  Brother of James, Joses, Simon, Judas?  Don't we know his sisters? (Matt. 13:54-58)  Not even His own siblings believed in Jesus (John 7:3-5).

     

    Pr. Conway brought up an interesting point: the only people who seemed to affirm Jesus' identity and the power of God were people who were out of their minds, or not in line with the Truth.  The demon-possessed man cried out, "What have You to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God?" (Mark 5:7).  [After Jesus' ascension, a woman possessed by an evil spirit claimed that Paul and his companions were the "servants of the most high God, which shew unto us the way of salvation" (Acts 16:16-18).  They quickly rebuked and cast out the evil spirit within her.]

     

    It seemed as though the devil was trying to drive Jesus out of His mind, telling Him, You're not who You say You are.  As a matter of fact, no one believes you anyways.

     

    Even today, people seek to discount Jesus' divinity, trying to paint Jesus as simply a man, a historical figure who did a lot of good things.  His challenge-- this questioning of His identity-- is one that His followers go through as well.

     

    Through many different means, Satan is trying to undermine our identity as Seventh-day Adventist Christians.  He's trying to fill our minds with doubt, not only over "basic" things like creation, Jesus' divinity, the authority of the Bible, etc.-- he's trying to tell us that we're being extreme when we start to worry about "little" details, like how we eat (vegan), how we dress (modestly), how we speak (respectfully, choosing words carefully, at the very least), how often or how long we study the Bible, how we keep the Sabbath, etc. 

     

    (Now here's the part where I'm especially talking to myself…)

    We're nice people, right?  We don't want to be trouble-makers… So one way to get us to succumb to our doubts is to slowly and subtly get us to conform to the world-- to conform to the way others do things, so that we don't fall into any traps of "extremism" (read: legalism) or so we don't shake things up unnecessarily, even if something is out of place…

     

    But the Lord is constantly asking us through His Word to be different-- to be transformed.  Change is rarely comfortable at first, but it's necessary.  This is one lesson I still need to apply to my life.  It's an encouragement, though, to know that it's by God's mercies, and not my own strength, that giving my best to the master, presenting my life as a living sacrifice to God, is even possible.  Heaven knows I'm weak.

     

    Help me, Lord.  I want to be a real Christian.


    "Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed, for the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest."  Joshua 1:9

Friday, 30 November 2007

  • Drawn from Colporteur Ministry...

    "The secret of success is the union of divine power with human effort.  Those who achieve the greatest results are those who rely most implicitly upon the Almighty Arm."  PP 509

    "God will accept the wholehearted service, and will Himself make up the deficiencies."  MH 150

    "To everyone who offers himself to the Lord for service, withholding nothing, is given the power for the attainment of measureless results."  7T 30

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]